Removing the Flak to Reveal the Real Issue

In World War II the success of the Allies’ landing on the shores of Normandy can be accredited to a massive disinformation scheme. The Allied High Command literally held their breath as the events played out, for it was again plainly life or death to bring down Hitler’s Third Reich. Total victory over this evil regime was very dependent upon the success of this Normandy invasion. 

There has been a massive disinformation scheme in operation for hundreds of years involving all of mankind. Hitler wanted to believe the false scenario so he was deceived into thinking the landing was taking place in another location. Mankind wants fervently to believe the deceits and lies that have been in operation for hundreds of years. So she/he has been deceived and is being deceived, led to the slaughter.

Religion is having a very visible effect on all participants in this presidential race as is evidenced in Rachel Zoll’s article in the Associated Press, Jan 15, 2012, concern about Romney’s faith quieter but not  gone.

But religion is just a lot of flak, concealing the real issues. Rachel wrote: 

“The Romney campaign is making a play for these votes with a focus on values, according to Mark Demoss, a senior adviser to Romney and a veteran public relations executive who represents evangelical pastors and ministries.”

Rachel continues:  

The campaign released in a new radio ad on Friday asserts,“Today, Christian conservatives are supporting Mitt Romney because he shares their values: the sanctity of life, the sacredness of marriage and the importance of the family.”

The campaign is playing religion like a fiddle, making all kinds of music even to having Romney make a definite statement in the article. 

To quote Rachel Zoll:

Underscoring the focus on religion in this state, if not the skepticism about Romney’s faith, the second question from the audience at a town hall-style event in Hilton Head on Friday was whether he believes “in the Divine saving grace of Jesus Christ?” His answer : “Yes, I do.”

Webster’s Dictionary defines religion as the service and worship of God or the supernatural.

The definition of religion covers a lot of ground, so it behooves a person or persons to define their understanding.

The question asked of Romney was: Do you believe in the Divine saving grace of Jesus Christ?

This is a religious question and Romney’s answer was, Yes, I do.  He lied, but how would one prove that answer a lie? 

A real incident occurred during a Drill Weekend, in which a Lieutenant, who is Jewish, was relating an event that greatly disturbed him. A female friend, also an officer and also Jewish, was hassled by her commanding officer, who was a Christian, to change her religion. She left military service because of it.

There is a point here: What constitutes a Christian? This senior officer proved he was not a Christian. That was broadcast loud and clear. He was religious, yes, but not a Christian, though he claimed he was.

In the 1830’s a man, Joseph Smith, entered the scene. He was a man with a vision, a religious vision, and he was going to sell that vision. But in order to do so the vision couldn’t be too far out. It had to be believable. 

He took the name “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints” certain that would cloak his real intentions, and it did, for in the Constitution of the United States, freedom of religion is promised.

The cloak would keep his unlawful action from being removed as a sect, a personification of evil not imagined, witchcraft at best, sorcery and necromancy at its height. While this organization had its battles, it could not be removed, for its real intent was carefully hidden under the disguise of being Christian. Look at the name, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Plagiarism is not new; it is carried out every day. In institutions of higher learning, students are required to sign an affidavit promising not to plagiarize the work of other individuals or companies. It is not legal. It is acrime, an unlawful deed.

To illustrate: to steal the name of say Land’s End products would stir up a raft of troubles. To put that name on goods not Land’s End’s, represents a fraud, an unlawful deed.

That is the crime of the Mormons whose church has the angel Maroni on its steeple. They stole the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, but their product cannot in any way be construed as an authentic product of that name; this is a great deceit and an act of thievery. 

Back to Romney. He is a member of a deceitful organization that masks its real intent. Can you, the voter, trust a thief, a robber? How valid are his promises? ‘We are just like you; we have values that are just like your values. Trust us; we will give you what you want in government. Trust us.’

Yes, the religious cloak of righteousness --- we will do what is right, the Christian thing. Trust us.

When Joseph Smith appeared in the 1830’s, his preaching and teaching was met with skepticism, and later with outright doubt and hostility. Those who heard his doctrine knew instinctively that something was wrong, but they knew not what it was.

It is the same today. The Mormons are conning them but they cannot comprehend it because they, the Christian, cannot discern the true state of reality for they live in a fantasy world.

The article from Zoll referred to Kennedy overcoming prejudice to be the first Catholic president who promised that no authorities of his church would influence his policies. But then, so does Romney. Can the voter really believe this? Trust me, he said, to keep my promises.

Kennedy’s beliefs were out in the open. Whatever they were they were not cloaked in awesome deceits and deceptions.

However, the bottom line that is being broadcast is that we, the Mormons, and we, the Christians, can work things out together to elect a president who will work out our outstanding problems. After all, the country elects a president not a preacher.

What the bottom line is really saying, however subtle, is, Leave God out of this.

Now will this affirmation do the trick? Will truly God, who is being told straight out, Stay out of this, obey? For there is no doubt, according to them, however protested, He is just part of religion, which a person can take or leave at their discretion.

It is also of interest that the view taken by the Mormon is also the view taken by the Christian. 

The Mormon states and stands firm in that statement, that he/she can plagiarize the Son of God’s name, put it at the head of his religion and God will look the other way. 

Certainly it would seem so, for 180 years have gone by and they have not been called to account for this transgression.

The fact is they, the Mormons, have prospered in a very astonishing way and now number in the millions. They also felt very confident in sending one of their members to be in the prestigious position of the President of the United States, an awesome accomplishment.

“We, the Mormons, are quite in the right, what God thinks about it matters not. We are moving on in our pursuits, and who will or can stop us? Even to become rulers of the nation that was raised up by Divine Providence and Divine Intervention?”

Now for the Christians, What is their state of unreality? What are THEY saying to God? They can, with complete impunity, take the position that only the Lord Jesus Christ can take, and that is the HEAD of the church. They, the Christians, have put men in His place as pastors, teachers, evangelists and priests. Does man have the mind of God? Certainly not! So what do you expect to happen when man takes God’s place? Where is the wisdom, knowledge and
understanding that can only come from God? It’s not in man, so it is no wonder they are floundering like fish out of water.

So again the question comes, Can mankind continue in his state of unreality, claiming the “right” to be religious, so that he can leave God out of his existence?
                                                                                                                               
January  17, 2012